|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Focusing the Asteroid Belt of Organizations
Royston Greenwood*
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: royston.greenwood{at}ualberta.ca.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Concurring with Barleys pessimism that we do neglect the study of how corporations seek to influence and perhaps have captured the State, this text suggests two starting points that can give theoretical and practical leverage to investigate those issues. Theoretically, the institutional perspective, which always had an interest in the influence of elite groups, is a highly appropriate platform to study those phenomena for three reasons. First, it focuses on interorganizational relations as the setting we have to consider. Second, it questions the taken-for-granted overarching "logics" by which we operate, thus allowing us to understand why and how the relationships between corporations and the State are tolerated and can be undermined. Third, it raises issues of language, including how political interests are concealed in legitimating rhetoric. Empirically, the text suggests that a useful starting point would be to investigate the role of refereesof the system, such as audit firms, law firms, and investment banks.
First published on April 24, 2008, doi:10.1177/1056492608316917
Journal of Management Inquiry 2008;17:152.
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Marti, D. Etzion, and B. Leca
Theoretical Approaches for Studying Corporations, Democracy, and the Public Good
Journal of Management Inquiry,
September 1, 2008;
17(3):
148 - 151.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Barley
Rejoinder
Journal of Management Inquiry,
September 1, 2008;
17(3):
168 - 171.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|