Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoobler, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On-Site or Out-of-Sight?

Family-Friendly Child Care Provisions and the Status of Working Mothers

Jenny M. Hoobler

University of Illinois at Chicago, jhoobler{at}uic.edu

"Family-friendly" initiatives are gaining in popularity as employers attempt to ease the fit between work and family. A number of organizations offer on- or near-site child care facilities to employees with young children. The author uses social identity theory to make the argument that family-friendly policies blurring the lines between work roles and family/caregiver roles serve to reinforce gender biases that degrade women's status on the job. Because women are the primary users of on-site child care services, and family roles are devalued in managerial employment, such "family-friendly" programs force women to sacrifice the quest for workplace equality, opting instead for short-term solutions.

Key Words: gender • work—family • identity

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139-158.[CrossRef]
  • Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565-595.[CrossRef]
  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D.A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  • Allen, T.D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414-435.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ashforth, B.E., & Humphrey, R.H. (1997). The ubiquity and potency of labeling in organizations. Organization Science, 8, 43-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bergmann, B.R. (1998, January-February). Watch out for "family friendly" policies. Dollars and Sense, 215, 10-11.
  • Bond, J.T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2002). National study of the changing workforce (Vol. 3). New York: Families and Work Institute. Available from www.familiesandwork.org
  • Calas, M.B., & Smircich, L. (1996). From "the woman's" point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218-257). London: Sage.
  • Connelly, R., DeGraff, D.S., & Willis, R. (2002). If you build it, they will come: Parental use of on-site child care centers. Population Research and Policy Review, 21, 241-273.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Corley, K.G., Harquail, C.V., Pratt, M.G., Glynn, M.A., Fiol, C.M., & Hatch, M.J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 85-99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Crouter, A.C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work/family interface. Human Relations, 37, 425-442.[Abstract]
  • Dikkers, J., den Dulk, L., Guerts, S., & Peper, B. (2004). Work—life culture in two organizations in the Netherlands. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Domagalski, T.A. (1999). Emotion in organizations: Main currents. Human Relations, 52, 833-852.[Web of Science]
  • Faught, L. (1995, March). Sound reasons for work—life programs. HRMagazine, 142, 144.
  • Ferguson, A. (1997). On conceiving motherhood and sexuality: A feminist materialist approach. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 39-63). New York: Routledge.
  • Fernandez, J.P. (1990). The politics and reality of family care in corporate America. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Fineman, S. (1996). Emotion and organizing. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 543-564). London: Sage.
  • Friedman, S.D., & Greenhaus, J.H. (2000). Work and family— Allies or enemies? New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Galinsky, E., Bond, J.T., & Friedman, D.E. (1996). The role of employers in addressing the needs of employed parents. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 111-136.
  • Galinsky, E., Friedman, D.E., & Hernandez, C. (1991). The corporate reference guide to work—family programs. New York: Families and Work Institute.
  • Gutek, B.A., Repetti, R.L., & Silver, D.L. (1988). Nonwork roles and stress at work. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 141-174). New York: John Wiley.
  • Haas, L., Allard, K., & Hwang, P. (2002). The impact of organizational culture on men's use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 5, 319-341.[CrossRef]
  • Harrell, J.E., & Ridley, C.A. (1975). Substitute child care, maternal employment and the quality of mother—child interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37, 556-564.[CrossRef]
  • Hartsock, N.C. (1997). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 462-483). New York: Routledge.
  • Haslanger, S. (1996). Female reality, male reality, and social construction. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 84-107). New York: Routledge.
  • Henly, J.R. (2003). Managing work and child care responsibilities in the retail sector: Informal relationships and their limits. Manuscript prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Joint Center on Poverty Research.
  • Hesse-Biber, S., & Carter, G.L. (2000). Working women in America: Split dreams. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hochschild, A.R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Hofferth, S.L. (2001). Women's employment and care of children in the United States. In L. van Dijk & T. van der Lippe (Eds.), Women's employment in comparative perspective (pp. 151-174). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Hofferth, S.L., & Collins, N. (2000). Child care and employment turnover. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 357-395.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Holcomb, B. (2000, April/May). Friendly for whose family? Ms., 40-45.
  • Hopfl, H., & Linstead, S. (1993). Passion and performance: Suffering and the carrying of organizational roles. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 76-93). London: Sage.
  • Jackall, R. (1978). Workers in a labyrinth: Jobs and survival in a bank bureaucracy. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.
  • Kirby, E.L., & Krone, K.J. (2002). "The policy exists but you can't really use it": Communication and the structuration of work—family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kossek, E.E., & Nichol, V. (1992). The effects of on-site child care on employee attitudes and performance. Personnel Psychology, 45, 485-509.[Web of Science]
  • Lewis, S. (1991). Motherhood and/or employment: The impact of social and organizational values. In A. Phoenix, A. Woollett, & E. Lloyd (Eds.), Motherhood: Meanings, practices, and ideologies. London: Sage.
  • Lewis, S. (1997). "Family friendly" employment policies: A route to changing organizational culture or playing about at the margins? Gender, Work, and Organization, 4, 13-23.[CrossRef]
  • Lewis, S. (1999). How to voice the needs to reconcile work and family in the workplace? European diversities: Combining work and family in different settings of working life, family life, and culture (pp. 43-51). Seminar report. Helsinki: Stakes.
  • Lewis, S. (2001). Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work—family challenge? Women in Management Review, 16, 21-29.[CrossRef]
  • Littleton, C.A. (1997). Reconstructing sexual equality. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 715-734). New York: Routledge.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545-564.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Marks, S. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Oppenheimer, V.K. (1982). Work and family: A study in social demography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Pearson, A. (2003). I don't know how she does it. New York: Anchor.
  • Roccas, S., & Brewer, M.B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88-106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Rothausen, T.J., Gonzalez, J.A., Clarke, N.E., & O'Dell, L.L. (1998). Family-friendly backlash—Fact or fiction? The case of organizations' on-site child care centers. Personnel Psychology, 51, 685-706.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ruddick, S. (1997). Maternal thinking. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 584-603). New York: Routledge.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77-98). London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Tetrick, L.E., Miles, R.L., Marcil, L., & Van Dosen, C.M. (1994). Child-care difficulties and the impact on concentration, stress, and productivity among single and non-single mothers and fathers. In G. P. Keita & J. J. Hurrell, Jr. (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce (pp. 229-239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Thompson, C., Beauvais, L., & Lyness, K. (1999). When work— family benefits are not enough: The influence of work— family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work—family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 329-415.
  • Turner, J.C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Turner, J.C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 518-538). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.[Abstract]
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004). March Current Population Survey. Population Division, Fertility and Family Statistics Branch. Available from www.census.gov
  • Whetten, D.A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 219-234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 4, 372-380 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492607305909


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Lounsbury and P. M. Hirsch
Editors' Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2008; 17(3): 172 - 172.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoobler, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?