Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Driver, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Reviewer Feedback as Discourse of the Other

A Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Manuscript Review Process

Michaela Driver

East Tennessee State University

This article contributes to dialog in the field about the nature of the manuscript review process. It develops a psychoanalytic framework for understanding how participants in the review process construct each other as subjects in discourse and why the experience of alienation inevitably marks this process. The framework suggests that participants can draw on different subject positions with regard to this alienation. One is imaginary and entails the failed fantasy that lack and alienation can be overcome. The other is symbolic and entails a mutual engagement with this failure. The article suggests imaginary positions are less constructive, resulting in struggles between participants as others. By contrast, it suggests symbolic positions are more constructive, resulting in struggles with otherness and opportunities for more creative outcomes. The article explores reviewer reflexivity as an important element of symbolic interactions in which participants have responsibility for the production of relationships in the review process.

Key Words: review process • discourse • psychoanalysis • Lacan • subjectivity

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. London: Sage.
  • Arnaud, G. (2002). The organization and the symbolic: Organizational dynamics viewed from a Lacanian perspective. Human Relations, 55, 691-716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Arnaud, G. (2003). A coach or a couch? A Lacanian perspective on executive coaching and consulting. Human Relations, 56, 1131-1143.[Abstract]
  • Arnaud, G., & Vanheule, S. (2007). The division of the subject and the organization: A Lacanian approach to subjectivity at work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 359-369.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ashford, S.J. (1996). The publishing process: The struggle for meaning. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 119-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ashforth, B.E. (2005). Becoming vanilla pudding: How we undermine our passion for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 400-403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bedeian, A.G. (2003). The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331-338.[Abstract]
  • Benvenuto, B., & Kennedy, R. (1986). The works of Jacques Lacan. New York: St. Martin's.
  • Bowie, M. (1991). Lacan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bracher, M. (2000). How analysis cures according to Lacan. In K. R. Malone & S. R. Friedlander (Eds.), The subject of Lacan: A Lacanian reader for psychologists (pp. 189-207). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Brousse, M. (1996). The imaginary. In R. Feldstein, B. Fink, & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminars I and II: Lacan's return to Freud (pp. 118-129). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • De Rond, M., & Miller, A.N. (2005). Publish or perish: Bane or boon for academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Driver, M. (2005). From empty speech to full speech? Reconceptualizing spirituality in organizations based on a psychoanalytically-grounded understanding of the self. Human Relations, 58, 1091-1110.[Abstract]
  • Elliott, A., & Frosh, S. (1995). Psychoanalysis in contexts. London: Routledge.
  • Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Fink, B. (1996). The subject and the other's desire. In R. Feldstein, B. Fink, & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminars I and II: Lacan's return to Freud (pp. 76-97). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Fink, B. (2004). Lacan to the letter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Frost, P.J., & Stablein, R.E. (1992). Themes and variations. In P. J. Frost & R. E. Stablein (Eds.), Doing exemplary research (pp. 243-269). London: Sage.
  • Gallop, J. (1985). Reading Lacan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Glynos, J. (2002). Psychoanalysis operates upon the subject of science: Lacan between science and ethics. In J. Glynos & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Lacan and science (pp. 51-88). London: Karnac.
  • Graham, J.W., & Stablein, R.E. (1985). Newcomer's perspective on publishing in the organizational sciences. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (pp. 138-154). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
  • Haley, B., Hardy, C., & Alvesson, M. (2004, August). Reflecting on reflexivity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Journal of Management & Organization, 31(3), 25-48.
  • Hatch, M.J. (1996). The role of the researcher: An analysis of narrative position. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 359-374.[Free Full Text]
  • Holland, R. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52, 463-481.[Abstract]
  • Jeffcut, P. (1994). From interpretation to representation in organizational analysis: Postmodernism, ethnography and organizational symbolism. Organization Studies, 15, 241-274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jones, C., & Spicer, A. (2005). The sublime object of entrepreneurship. Organization, 12, 223-246.[Abstract]
  • Kaghan, W., & Phillips, N. (1998). Building the Tower of Babel: Communities of practice and paradigmatic pluralism in organization studies. Organization, 5, 191-215.[Abstract]
  • Karreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2001). Making newsmakers: Conversational identity at work. Organization Studies, 22, 59-90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lacan, J. (1968). The language of the self. New York: Delta. Lacan, J. (1977a). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. London: Hoghart Press.
  • Lacan, J. (1977b). Ecrits (A Selection). New York: Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (1988a). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud's papers on technique 1953-1954. New York: Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (1988b). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis 1954-1955. New York: Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (1991). Le seminaire de Jacques Lacan 1969-1970, Livre XVII: L'envers de la psychanalyse (The seminar of Jacques Lacan, book XVII 1969-1970: The other side of psychoanalysis). Paris: Editions Du Seuil.
  • Lacan, J. (2001). Autres ecrits (Other Writings). Paris: Editions Du Seuil.
  • Leblebici, H. (1996). The act of reviewing and being a reviewer. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 269-274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Linstead, S. (1994). Objectivity, reflexivity, and fiction: Humanity, inhumanity, and the science of the social. Human Relations, 46, 1321-1346.
  • Marshak, R.J., Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., & Grant, D. (2000). From outer words to inner worlds. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 245-259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Miner, J.B. (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian's "The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors." Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 339-343.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Muller& Richardson, W.J. 1982. Lacan and Language. New York: International University Press.
  • Phillips, N. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625-649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Putnam, L.L. (1996). Situating the author and text. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 382-386.[Free Full Text]
  • Ragland, E. (1996). An overview of the real, with examples from Seminar I. In R. Feldstein, B. Fink, & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminars I and II: Lacan's return to Freud (pp. 192-211). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Roberts, J. (2005). The power of the "imaginary" in disciplinary processes. Organization, 12, 621-645.
  • Rustin, M. (1995). Lacan, Klein and politics. In A. Elliott & S. Frosh (Eds.), Psychoanalysis in contexts (pp. 223-245). London: Routledge.
  • Soler, C. (1996). The symbolic order. In R. Feldstein, B. Fink, & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminars I and II: Lacan's return to Freud (pp. 47-75). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Starbuck, W.H. (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344-351.[Abstract]
  • Vanheule, S. (2006). Neurotic depressive trouble: In between the signifier and the real. Unpublished working paper.
  • Vanheule, S., Lievrouw, A., & Verhaeghe, P. (2003). Burnout and intersubjectivity: A psychoanalytical study from a Lacanian perspective. Human Relations, 56, 321-338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Verhaeghe, P. (1999). Does the woman exist? From Freud's hysteric to Lacan's feminine. New York: Other Press.
  • Verhaeghe, P. (2001). Beyond gender. New York: Other Press.
  • Verhaeghe, P. (2006). Enjoyment and impossibility: Lacan's revision of the Oedipal complex. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and other side of psychoanalysis (pp. 29-50. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Weick, K.E. (1999). Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review, 24, 797-809.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 4, 351-360 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492607310982


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Driver, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?