Journal of Management Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aldag, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 6, No. 1, 8-16 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/105649269761003

Moving Sofas and Exhuming Woodchucks

On Relevance, Impact, and the Following of Fads

Ramon J. Aldag

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Continuing concerns about the relevance and impact of management research deserve reflection and response. In this article, the author considers ways to increase management research relevance, including rewards for relevance and mechanisms for inreach. The author argues, however, that management research is already quite relevant and that basic research and research that appears somehow "artificial" should not be sacrificed on the altar of relevance. Conversely, the author argues that seeking relevance by following fads creates an unfortunate and dangerous illusion of responsiveness. To enhance impact, the author suggests seeking channels for better communication of the relevance and applicability of management research as well as the presentation of management research to potential users in intrinsically appealing ways. This might require using more concrete examples and metaphors and telling better stories. It should not involve "dummying down" research reports or debasing the nature of the research process.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
S. Pagel and R. Westerfelhaus
Charting Managerial Reading Preferences in Relation to Popular Management Theory Books: A Semiotic Analysis
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2005; 42(4): 420 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
T. Kuhn
Negotiating Boundaries between Scholars and Practitioners: Knowledge, Networks, and Communities of Practice
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2002; 16(1): 106 - 112.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
C. De Cock
Essal: Reflections on Fiction, Representation, and Organization Studies: An Essay with Special Reference to the Work of Jorge Luis Borges
Organization Studies, May 1, 2000; 21(3): 589 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
C. De Cock
"It Seems to Fill My Head with Ideas": A Few Thoughts on Postmodernism, TQM, and BPR
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 1998; 7(2): 144 - 153.
[Abstract]