This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rasche, A. Articles by Behnam, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

As If it Were Relevant

A Systems Theoretical Perspective on the Relation Between Science and Practice

Warwick Business School

Michael Behnam

Suffolk University

This article discusses the concept of research relevance from a systems theoretical perspective. Based on the claim that many scholars still think of relevance as something that can be achieved and enhanced by choosing the "right" measures (e.g., "user-friendly" writing style), the authors argue that such a perspective obscures the self-referential status of "science" and "practice" as social systems in society. Our systems theoretical discussion, which is based on the work of German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, shows that, strictly speaking, science cannot produce relevant knowledge prior to application. Instead, practice has to make scientific knowledge relevant by incorporating it into the specific logic of its system. We argue that such an integration of knowledge is only possible by first acting as if the offered knowledge were relevant and to then modify and extend it according to the idiosyncrasies of the system. We characterize these as-if assumptions as fictions and show their significance for rethinking the concept of relevance.

Key Words: research relevance • systems theory • fictions • science and practice

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 18, No. 3, 243-255 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492609337495


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?