Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vit, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Multiple Logics of Conformity and Contrarianism: The Problem With Investment Banks and Bankers

Gregory B. Vit

McGill University

The pressures of conformity within a highly institutionalized organizational field such as corporate and investment banking in the United States are formidable. Coercive, cognitive, and normative pressures often move the herd in the same direction. Paradoxically, each firm believes it is unique and can manage future strategic actions, as it collectively runs off a cliff. This process is not bound in time or space, as researchers grounded in experience have suggested that costly financial bubbles have been common to banking organizational fields in both recent and ancient history. This override of learning may possibly be explained by mutually reinforcing institutional and organizational logics and processes. The author also argues that an awareness of the underlying conformist logics of financial mania, institutional, and configuration theory may explain why some organizations manage to be nonconformist or contrarian. These different firms observe this reliance on powerful multiple logics of conformity and resist them intendedly and unintendedly. The author calls this process contrarianism.

Key Words: institutional logics • organizational logics • institutional theory • investment banking • conformity and contrarianism

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 3, 217-226 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492607305893
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Lounsbury and P. M. Hirsch
Editors' Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2008; 17(4): 305 - 305.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Washington
Editor's Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2007; 16(4): 391 - 391.
[PDF]