Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

We Are Who We Teach

How Teaching Experienced Managers Fractures Our Scholarship

Jone L. Pearce

University of California, Irvine

It is argued that teaching is more important to shared understanding of management and organizations than scholars acknowledge. Teaching has been ignored in discussions of scholars' intellectual enterprise, in part, because of a practicality that violates Romantic Era ideals of intellectuals as otherworldly and pure. Yet teachers in conversation with their students have always been central to how students learn and develop their ideas. In the case of management professors, who they teach (students with management experience), the institutional context in which they teach them (tuition-dependent and rankings-focused university business schools), and the publishing industry (increasingly focused on lower-division books for teenagers) are as much causes of the fractured visage of management scholarship as are any actions of the field's elites. Implications for action include more open conversations about how MBA teaching influences our intellectual work and the development of coherent books for experienced adult students.

Key Words: teaching • paradigm • MBA

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 2, 104-110 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492607302412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Washington
Editor's Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2010; 19(1): 25 - 25.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
C. Oliver
The Goals of Scholarship
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2010; 19(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
P. Olk and P. Rosenzweig
The Halo Effect and the Challenge of Management Inquiry: A Dialog Between Phil Rosenzweig and Paul Olk
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2010; 19(1): 48 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
N. Phillips and M. Washington
Editors' Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, March 1, 2009; 18(1): 3 - 3.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Lounsbury and P. Hirsch
Editors' Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2007; 16(4): 299 - 299.
[PDF]