Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedeian, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Manuscript Review Process

The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors

Arthur G. Bedeian

Louisiana State Universityabede{at}lsu.edu

Drawing on a 28-item survey, this article reports the editorial experiences of 173 lead authors of articles published in theAcademy of Management Journal andAcademy of Management Review, over the period 1999 to 2001, to explore some relatively new dynamics that have changed the character of the manuscript review process and given rise to a mounting debate over the proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Among the survey’s more disturbing findings, more than one third of the responding authors reported that recommended revisions in their manuscripts were based on an editor’s or referee’s personal preferences, and almost 25% indicated that in revising their manuscripts they had actually made changes they felt were incorrect.

Key Words: editorial peer review • journal editing • social construction of knowledge • publishing process

Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 4, 331-338 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1056492603258974
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. G. Bedeian, D. D. Van Fleet, and H. H. Hyman III
Scientific Achievement and Editorial Board Membership
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 211 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. S. Tsui and J. R. Hollenbeck
Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers: Balancing Supply and Demand in the Organizational Sciences
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 259 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. G. Bedeian, D. D. Van Fleet, and H. H. Hyman III
``Circle the Wagons and Defend the Faith'': Slicing and Dicing the Data
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 276 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
V. L. Barker III
Editor's Introduction
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2007; 16(4): 349 - 350.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. Driver
Reviewer Feedback as Discourse of the Other: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on the Manuscript Review Process
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2007; 16(4): 351 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Information ScienceHome page
S. Macdonald and J. Kam
Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies
Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 702 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Management InquiryHome page
R. T. Mowday
Vertical Integration as an Explanation for the Creation of Special Journal Issues
Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2007; 16(3): 250 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]